Increased research output doesn’t lead to higher international rankings for Canadian universities
University of Alberta among eight top 10 Canadian universities to fall in latest QS world rankings.
By MICHAEL BROWN
The University of Alberta maintained its position as the fourth-ranked university in Canada in the latest QS World University Rankings but lost some ground globally, as did seven other top 10 universities in the country.
The top three Canadian schools were largely unchanged year over year—the University of Toronto was up three spots to 28, McGill slipped one position to sit 33rd and UBC moved four places to break into the top 50 at 47.
Despite being ranked in the top 100 consistently for the past five years, the U of A fell to 109 this year—and they weren't alone. McMaster sank six places to 146, Université de Montréal tumbled 19 spots to rest at 149, Waterloo slumped 11 placements to 163, Western slid four spots to finish at 210, the University of Calgary skidded 12 rungs to 229 and Queen’s fell 15 slots to land at 239.
Of the remaining 16 Canadian universities in the ranking, only Memorial University in Newfoundland improved its ranking, moving into the 651-700 echelon.
Canadian scholarly output rises, yet lags behind global average
Over the last year, 21 of Canada’s 26 ranked institutions saw their scores for citations per faculty fall. This trend in relative research output and impact is mirrored by Canada’s performance in the academic reputation measure, which saw 24 of Canada’s 26 ranked institutions dip.
This is not to say that Canadian researchers are doing less. To the contrary, according to the rankings, Canadian institutions have increased their research output by an average of 7.3 per cent and attracted an average of 13.2 per cent more citations compared to last year.
While this sounds promising, Ben Sowter, research director for QS, said these growth numbers are significantly lower than the global averages of 12.1 per cent and 22.2 per cent, respectively.
“Citations performance and academic reputation performance are linked,” said Sowter. “Respondents are far more likely to nominate institutions in the survey if they have read and referenced their outputs in the pursuit of their research.
“Vying for that academic attention is an increasingly competitive endeavour, and our analysis suggests that Canada has not been keeping pace.”
There is also evidence that Canada remains highly attractive to international students. It is in the international student ratio indicator that Canadian performance is most resilient, with 13 of 26 institutions improving their relative score. Three Canadian universities are among the top 100 for international student ratios: McGill (73), U of T (88) and Simon Fraser University (91).
And the task for Canadian universities to recapture lost ground isn’t going to get any easier.
Both the United Kingdom and the United States saw slightly more improvements than drops in their performance.
China’s strategy paying off
As well, China’s Tsinghua University became the first Chinese university in the top 20 in the history of the QS World University Rankings (17th, up from 25th) and more are taking aim at the top 100.
Jia Wang, deputy director of the U of A’s China Institute, said that starting around 2000, the Chinese government embarked on a strategy to triple the number of Chinese universities to almost 3,000. Today, Chinese universities enroll 20 million students and graduate more than twice as many students as the U.S.
“That’s not likely to change,” said Wang. “You don’t have to tell a rural farmer in China that it is a good idea to send their child to university; education is very rooted in Chinese culture.”
Wang added quantity is one thing, but in fact the Chinese government has a goal of having 40 of the world’s top universities by mid-century.
“You see the Chinese government promoting a mega-strategy of building up the country’s higher education system,” she said. “The government believes the science and technology sectors are key to transforming its economy from a solely investment- and export-driven one to a more sophisticated, high-tech manufacturing economy with higher consumption coming from within the country.”
Globally, Massachusetts Institute of Technology was named the world’s best university for a record-breaking seventh consecutive year. It was followed by Stanford and Harvard.
QS uses six indicators to determine an institution’s final score, each measuring institutional performance according to key elements of their mission.